# UW logo critique-athon

Unlike other terrible ideas that no one liked, Waterloo decided it was probably not a good idea to press ahead with a logo that was universally loathed. In a rare moment of humility, they even decided to solicit feedback from real people. Of course, all this is for naught if the new logos are as terrible as the old ones.

AHAHAHAHAHAHA. It’s pretty terrible. （　´_ゝ）

Here, we have the first new one. It’s a huge improvement over the other one. The most obvious criticisms of Unlimited Laser Works were the billions of lines and the billions of colours used. The first is taken care of by focusing on black and gold, the school’s colours. The second is taken care of by the slight tilt and cutting the top a bit. That conveys the dynamism or whatever without having tons of crazy lines flying all over the place.

I wouldn’t mind this one at all, although I think some explanation of the process and what it symbolizes would help make it more interesting. Of course, I’m not going to whine and say it’s too plain, because it’s worlds better than the other extreme.

At first glance, this one is kind of unsettling because of the way the E fits in with the T and R. But if you take a look on the stationary (the letterhead and the business card), those three lines becomes a really clever little motif that is really flexible. I think it’s a lot better than the random curvy lines that they’re using now. It’s also not too hard to change for faculty use, just by swapping the gold for a faculty colour.

I think this one grew on me and became my choice. The problem with the other one is that it doesn’t have any strong elements that could be taken on its own, so the use of the giant W is forced upon you. This one also has the advantage of a fairly distinct wordmark.

## 6 thoughts on “UW logo critique-athon”

1. I have to agree with you,
the third one looks the best, mostly because it doesn’t suddenly have a huge W sticking out.

2. What they need is WATERLOO in the spiderman font. LOL

Yeah, the second one was much better, but seemed too plain. The third one was cool, but may end up looking like WAT-RLOO. Oh well, it’s a neat idea.

2nd one reminds me of The Beer Store (albeit with different colours)

WAT WAT for the 3rd one. I’d go with the lasers 3rd one too.

4. >spiderman font
（　´_ゝ）

5. Lol they should use ASCII characters to symbolize geekiness. (_/\_) ftw.

I kid sorta. I find the newer logos all chunky and plain and a bit kiddish. It’s akin to how as a kid we used to use Impact and giant letters for our titles. Perhaps the E nuance takes lessens that feeling… but in either case it’s gorgeously better than the pew pew.

6. I actually went up to the survey, then I realized it was going to take 30 minutes to complete and gave up.

I think they are doing this on purpose.

Oh and of all the logos, I liked the one on the bottom with the coat of arms :D